For starters.... and to flex your creative muscles.... This is a tough one. Could the whole stone be seen as a head facing either left OR right, with a pelt hat? The top half of the stone is lighter in color than the bottom -- is that difference intentional? Do you see the deep notches in the upper half? If intentionally cut, why was that done? Does the upper left half look like a camel head (or wing) and the right half like a bird's head? Does the bottom quarter of the stone look a bit like the outline of a boat? How many faces can you envision in the top half of the stone? large and small?
Provided that the attribution on the photo is retained, the above copyrighted photograph is published for free non-commercial "fair use" in any lawful publication, and especially for content-related research, teaching, and educational use in general. Andis Kaulins retains the copyright to the original photograph in any case, whereas a tracing of the photograph and further work such as coloring becomes the copyright of the maker. Have fun! and learn thereby to better understand our ancient human ancestors!
Admin: It appears as if there is a back and forth dialogue between two posters, the second posting is treated as a reply, which it does not have to be. It could be a new unrelated posting.
Aug 17, 2016 13:01:25 GMT
Admin: As I discovered in writing the previous shout, the posting shoutbox limit is 255 characters for any one shout....
Aug 17, 2016 13:00:05 GMT
Admin: I am doing some experimenting with the ProBoards functions. That accounts for the following Shoutbox postings. It is not intended as a "reply" to anyone so I am interested as to how ProBoards treats this ShoutBox posting, since only a reply option is shown
Aug 17, 2016 12:59:08 GMT
eddie: Andis, In your email of Aug 10, "Proto-European prehistoric peoples wished to 'fill' stones with life, for the ancients were puzzles that 'stones did not grow' as other things in nature did." That is a very interesting idea. How did you develop? Tks,
Aug 13, 2016 22:07:25 GMT